
Dis in the
Afternoon
by
Ed Tasca
Modern
psychologists now believe that the bullfight may not be what it has
always appeared to be – a primal, man-against-beast ceremonial
battle of grace against brawn. At least not to the bull. The
bullfight, theorists argue - from the bull’s point of view, is
really a torrid sexual coming-out for the bull, an experience, I
suppose, that is akin to our junior prom.
The
“best bulls,” they explain, are bred specifically for
sure-footedness and power – essentials in the ring. And these bulls
are never allowed to mate with the cows. I don’t know about “best
bulls.” But I suspect that the “smartest” bulls are those shuffling
along like bad drunks, tripping over everything, even catching their
horns in the bougainvillea and bringing the whole thing down on top
of themselves.) Now, not only are the “best bulls” undergoing forced
abstinence (something invented by the Catholics in the 12th
Century), but the bulls are deliberately teased into a libidinous
frenzy by having the best-looking cows right across the fence from
them, smelling great and sashaying about the pasture (looking, I
would guess, to a bull, like Paris Hiltons and sounding just as
articulate) – the sole purpose of which would be to further enrage
the bulls, who by this time, have to be wondering about this “best
bull” thing and the wisdom of their career
choice.
So
you have the bull, a frustrated virgin, going into the ring, without
a spritz of cologne or even a gift-corsage, to meet the torero who,
from the bull’s point of view, is just a “female symbol,” a flashy
pole dancer in effect. As such, the entire corrida ritual starts off
as some kind of weird sexual consummation for the bull and ends up
nothing more than a really bad blind date. (Make up your own “Olay”
joke here, but please don’t repeat it.)
My
own hypothesis then is that our beloved Papa (Hemingway, not the
Pope) knew all along about this scandalous carnal display, and it
disgusted him. In his famous novella, Death in the Afternoon, he
covered up the whole sexual context and chose to describe the event
in more socially acceptable terms, detailing only the goring,
gouging, lancing, and blood-letting (all the stuff we could read to
settle us down at bedtime).
I
have taken it upon myself to try to recreate what Hemingway would
have written about the bullfight if he were truly interested in the
truth:
Once
I remember Gertrude Stein talking of bullfights. She said they were
operatic, monumental, explosive even titillating, and that was just
her description of the matador’s pants.
My
first visit to the corrida occurred to fill a lazy afternoon and
empty a busy flask. I saw the bull rush through the puerta del toro
and gouge his hoofs into the coarse dirt like a true ganada bravo
(best bull) as if to say, “Flap your flirty little cape if you want,
senorita, but it will do you no good. I’m a big, irresistible macho
male, so don’t fool with me!” (Hemingway often projected himself
into his characterizations.) The bull’s announcement served only to
cue the torero into a balletic swirl behind his sweeping red muleta,
a turn the beast saw as nothing more than another fickle female
maybe/maybe-not seduction (Bull? Hemingway? Who knows?). The torero
then scoffed further at the bull by snapping his hips forward and
jamming his soft zapatillas provocatively into the earth just
beneath the bull’s snarling muzzle. This caused the bull’s blood to
rush back and forth between his horns and his hoofs, turning them
bright red, and causing the effect of an emergency alert, which the
torero ignored with a pout and a leer. The bull then snorted out
several heated breaths and narrowed his eyes - declaring he was now
certain the little torero wanted his baby.
The
bull then charged once again at his beloved, only to have the torero
leap into a mocking pas de chat, deliberately flashing his
breathtaking pink stockings from behind his Salome-like, fluttering
cape, driving the bull mercilessly mad with lust, and exclaiming
disdainfully that there could never be anything between him and the
bull – except possibly as a couple on Dancing With the Stars. It appeared that the bull
was getting weary and frustrated, and could have been persuaded to
settle for a simple, private lap dance. The crowds, those who hadn’t
already fainted, were beside themselves, and the policia had to
called in to calm them with firehoses.
You
can see from such an analysis that this bullfighting business is no
simple matter, no matter how you look at it. It continues to
challenge our ideas about our moral values, that is, is it right for
us to inflict such inhumane torture on a skinny little boy dressed
up in an ill-fitting, provocative costume and a funny hat – in the
name of sport?
Yes,
of course, you can argue that if the boy performed well, which means
he would have exhausted the beast and eviscerated his spirit, the
boy would be applauded, showered with flowers, even given some
decent clothes to wear. BUT! Weigh that against the prospect of the
bull performing well, which means the bull would have subdued the
torero, flattened him and
(Continued on Page 43 of The National
Enquirer.)