|
Someone to Watch Over Me
(The ACLU vs. The Boy Scouts of
America) by Horace J. Digby
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed another law suit
to keep the U.S. Army from having too much contact with the Boy Scouts of
America.
Thank goodness we have the ACLU to protect
Scouts have held their National Jamboree at Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia
since 1918, Over the years they have invested nearly $12 million in
permanent infrastructure at the fort. Not too bad a deal for the
Army, especially considering the Jamboree only lasts nine days once every
four years.
The ACLU claims this sort of Army support for the Boy Scouts
violates our First Amendment because the Scout Oath mentions God.
Apparently the ACLU has no problem with our Army supporting religious
factions in the Middle East.
Don't get me wrong. The ACLU is an important
organization. It's like Greenpeace, only without the boat.
Instead of sailing around protecting whales, the ACLU protects
liberty. And it must be doing a great job, if the Boy Scouts are the
biggest remaining threat.
To get a handle on the legal issues, I called my old friend Caufbaugh
Twilley. Twilley isn't actually a lawyer but he listens to talk
radio which is basically the same thing.
According to Twilley, the ACLU bases its suit on the first ten words
of the First Amendment, which are: "Please close cover before
striking."
No wait, that's the Ninth Amendment. The first ten words of the
First Amendment are: "Congress shall pass no law respecting an
establishment of religion . . ."
There are 35 other words in the First Amendment,
but Twilley said to ignore those.
At first glance, letting Boy Scouts camp at an Army
fort doesn't look very much like Congress passing a law
respecting religion.
"Ignore that too," Twilley said.
The ACLU has used this same argument to prevent Boy Scouts from
renting part of Balboa Park in San Diego.
"So, according to the ACLU, protecting religious freedom requires the
government to keep people who believe in God from using public
property?" I asked.
"That's not the way the ACLU says it," Twilley told me, "but the
effect is the same."
Now for some people, this sort of religious discrimination against
the Boy Scouts will sound a lot like religious discrimination against the
Boy Scouts, but Twilley said to "Ignore that
too."
It turns out those other 35 words protect free speech, free
association, free assembly and free exercise of religion. The
ACLU knows all about those words and has even used them to
protect the right of Nazis to hold a public rally in Skokie,
Illinois. Skokie was home to a large number of Holocaust survivors,
so the City wanted the Nazis to provide insurance for their rally.
Apparently requiring insurance is discrimination under those other 35
words. I wanted to know why the ACLU couldn't use some of those words
to protect the Boy Scouts.
"They can't do that," Twilley said. "It would make their whole
lawsuit seem frivolous. Besides, the ACLU might need those
words later, incase the Girl Scouts get uppity."
-- Horace J. Digby --
Winner of the Robert Benchley Society Award for Humor
Copyright © 2005, Lexington Film, LLC. All rights
reserved |